Passer au contenu principal

Your internet browser is out of date and not supported by this website. For the best viewing experience on wool.com, please update your browser to one of the options below.

MMFS Manual

Chapter 7.1 Build and maintain soil fertility

Background information

Building up and maintaining soil fertility is one of the most cost-effective investments than can be made in a grazing enterprise. Many Australian soils are naturally inherently low in nutrients, these nutrients can be removed in animal products (meat and wool) and hay, silage and grain.

Laboratory soil tests, plant tissue tests and the use of fertiliser test strips can all assist in making sure that the right amount of the correct fertiliser is being applied to meet your pasture growth objectives.

At a glance

  • Develop a soil testing program for your property to determine if nutrients are limiting pasture growth
  • Use the tools in this module to determine appropriate capital and maintenance fertiliser rates to address soil nutrient deficiencies.

The decisions relating to fertiliser application (such as the type that most suits your operation and the rates you might use) are essentially about pasture growth and maximising profit and are dealt with in this module.

Tool 6.6 in MMFS Module 6 Healthy Soils contains instructions for collecting soil samples for laboratory testing. Identifying soil health problems and assessing the need for remedial action or special management are addressed in chapter 6.3 and chapter 6.4 in MMFS Module 6 Healthy Soils.

Poor soil nutrient availability contributes to low pasture growth, low levels of desirable grasses and legumes and poor feed quality across most of the high rainfall and sheep-wheat zones of Australia.

Without gathering some objective information, it is very hard to assess the nutrient levels of the different soil types or management units on your property. There are three ways to get this information:

  • A laboratory soil test will identify if the macro elements (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur) are limiting pasture growth. Nitrogen (N) is very mobile in the soil and readily utilised by plants, so changes from season to season depending on plant growth and organic matter and legume breakdown). Standard laboratory soil tests are not the most accurate method of testing for trace element requirements, as it’s difficult to detect the relatively minute amounts (trace elements are most accurately measured by plant tissue testing). Tool 6.6 in MMFS Module 6 Healthy Soils outlines the procedure for collecting soil for a laboratory test. Soil tests also give you information about soil health (acidity, salinity, sodicity, etc., and whether your soil might be responsive to lime, gypsum or added nutrients in fertiliser). These issues are dealt with in Chapter 6.3 in MMFS Module 6 Healthy Soils. Use  to help interpret soil tests.
  • Plant tissue tests are more effective than soil tests in assessing whether trace elements are limiting pasture growth. Trace elements include molybdenum, copper, zinc and boron. Experienced local farmers, agronomists or veterinarians will know if trace element deficiencies are likely in your district. If you wish to assess the trace element requirements for pasture growth, take a sample of the most dominant species in the paddock during spring and submit samples to a reputable laboratory (see signposts). You will need to contact the laboratory or advisor to get the correct sampling technique for the trace element you are testing for.
  • Do it yourself, using fertiliser test strips. This method is particularly useful if your soil test results show marginal results for certain elements. This way, you can directly assess the likely response from fertiliser applications by laying out test strips in your paddock, as these can be used for any fertiliser type and are suited to situations where deficiency symptoms are not highly characteristic or where you want to test non-traditional fertilisers. Use tool 7.2 to set up and monitor your own fertiliser test strip.

Understanding pasture response to nutrients

Two examples of how much extra pasture can be grown, when nutrient deficiencies are corrected, are shown in figure 7.2 for an introduced pasture at Hamilton (Victoria) and a native pasture at Orange (NSW).

Figure 7.2 The effect of fertiliser on average monthly growth rates at Hamilton, Western Victoria (winter rainfall area) and Orange, Central Tablelands NSW (uniform rainfall area).
Source: Hamilton data simulated from GrassGro; Orange data from NSW PROGRAZE®
 

Phosphorus and native pastures

Native pastures containing some legume (e.g., clover, lucerne, serradella, medic) will respond to low rates of phosphorus (P) fertiliser. However, native species can decline under competition from clover, annual grasses or broadleaf weeds if fertility levels are raised and the additional feed not utilised. For native pastures, about 20% legume content in spring is the recommended maximum level.

For native grass pastures in high conservation areas or where an increase in native species diversity is desired, do not apply fertiliser or legume seed as both will reduce the conservation value.

Phosphorus and introduced pastures

Improved (also called exotic or introduced) pasture species have a higher requirement for nutrients than native grasses so fertilising paddocks with these species will give a bigger response and is essential for optimum production.

Generally, it is the legume component of the pasture which gives the immediate production and feed quality response to P fertilisers such as superphosphate if there are no other limiting factors such as acid soil. The legumes fix N, which becomes available to the grasses when the legume roots die off.

Nitrogen fertiliser

Some farmers rely on legumes to supply N to the grasses in the pasture but applying fertiliser to supply additional N is economical in some situations. Review the guidelines for the use of N in tool 7.4 to assess whether N fertiliser will be profitable for your sheep enterprise.

If you do want to rely on the legumes in your pasture mix supplying the N, you must ensure the legumes have adequately nodulated (figure 7.3) and are capable of fixing N in the quantities required by grasses.

Figure 7.3 A scoring system can be used to assess legume nodulation for plants growing for a minimum of 12 weeks in paddock situations.
Source: Yates RJ, Abaidoo R and Howieson JG (2016) Field experiments with rhizobia in Working with rhizobia, adapted by AWI and MLA

 

 

Legume roots with poor nodulation (few, small nodules that are white and not pink inside). Check soil acidity level and trace elements.
Source: photo on left – AWI and MLA; photo on right – Jo Powell, NSW LLS

 

Protect the environment

Ensure the proposed nutrients do not adversely impact on the environment. Given the prevailing conditions in a paddock, e.g., proximity to drainage lines, amount of bare ground, etc., nutrients may be easily lost to erosion, run-off or leaching beyond the root zone.

The most common issues caused by poor or over-application of fertilisers are:

1. Groundwater pollution – nitrate leaching through the soil can present a serious health hazard and contributes to soil acidification. When high rates of nitrogen are used or where clover grass pastures fix substantial nitrogen, especially on sandy or permeable soils, inevitably some nitrate is leached and may enter groundwater if there is a water table. If this groundwater is used for domestic supplies, the leaching presents a serious health hazard. To reduce the risk of leaching, apply nitrogen fertiliser in small amounts frequently rather than all at once.

2. Eutrophication – the enrichment of water by the addition of nutrients. The extra nutrients encourage the growth of algal blooms, particularly in stagnant water. Blue–green algae may produce toxins poisonous to animals, including humans. For algae to grow, phosphorus must be present in the water above a certain level. Phosphorus may be introduced into waterways in run-off from pasture, forests and fertilised land, and in drainage from irrigated land and urban areas. These sources, representing most of the total run-off, normally contribute low concentrations of phosphorus and are referred to as diffuse or non-point sources. Point sources, such as sewage effluent and drainage from dairies and feedlots, contribute smaller flows but contain much higher concentrations of phosphorus. These are frequently found to be the sources for most of the phosphorus found in waterways. To reduce the risk of contributing to phosphorus run-off, don't top dress dams, streams or swampy areas, or bare ground, and avoid topdressing when heavy rain is expected. Maintain good groundcover around dams and streams.

3. Soil acidity – there are three major acidifying processes in agricultural systems:
    1. addition of nitrogen to the soil by fertiliser or fixation of atmospheric nitrogen, followed by loss of nitrate from the soil due to leaching or run-off.
    2. production of organic acids from decomposing organic matter.
    3. removal of alkaline products such as hay from the soil.
        You can take several actions to lower acidification rates in your soil:
  • Use the least acidifying fertiliser you can find (for example, use urea rather than ammonium sulphate).
  • Incorporate stubbles into fallow to minimise net nitrification.
  • Sow early to maximise the opportunity of the crop to recover soil nitrate.
  • Use perennial, deep-rooted plants able to rapidly absorb mineralised nitrate at the start of the growing season and maintain low soil nitrate levels throughout the year.
  • Use deep-rooted crops.
  • Minimise water percolation below the root zone.
  • Avoid excessive irrigation.
  • Minimise removal of product from the soil. To prevent acidification, you need to apply 55–60 kg of lime for every tonne of lucerne or clover hay removed; 35 kg of lime per tonne of grass hay removed; 22 kg of lime per tonne of cereal hay removed; and 3 kg of lime per tonne of cereal grain removed.
  • Minimise manure removal from pastures, preferably leaving manure where the animals graze.
  • Feed hay on the paddocks where it is cut.
  • Use cropping rotations to minimise excessive accumulations of soil organic matter under pasture.

4. Cadmium build-up – cadmium is present in tiny amounts (less than 0.5 mg/L) in the soil, and in larger amounts in rock phosphate. Plant uptake of cadmium is small, but when plants containing cadmium are grazed by livestock, the cadmium accumulates in offal and may reach very high concentrations. This is a severe problem on the sandy grazing soils of South Australia and Western Australia but is not a problem on soils with even a low clay content.

Use tool 7.4 to quickly assess any potential nutrient losses.

Economics of fertilising pastures

The economic benefit of correcting nutrient deficiencies was evaluated by more than 100 producers (in VIC, NSW, TAS and SA) who participated in the Grasslands Productivity Program (GPP) from 1993 to 1997 (table 7.1). Pasture types ranged from improved perennial to annual to native. The average return was $1.89 for every dollar spent on fertiliser and livestock. Although livestock gross margins and fertiliser prices have changed since then, the response to fertiliser and resulting ability to increase stocking rate from the program will still hold true. Gross margins from 2016 to 2020 averaging approximately $35/DSE for wool sheep (source: Victorian Farm Monitor Program) make investing in fertiliser attractive.

Table 7.1 The economic benefit of correcting nutrient deficiencies for producers who participated in the Grassland Productivity Project (GPP) from 1993 – 1997.
Source:  Grasslands Productivity Program – final report to members (1998) prepared by J. Court. The Grasslands Society of Southern Australia.
 
Parameter GPP (VIC, NSW, SA, TAS) Victorian GPP sites NSW GPP sites
Change in stocking rate Data unavailable +28% +34%
Change in gross margin +25% +25% +30%
$ Return per $ spent $1.89 $2.17 $2.28
 

SIGNPOSTS